%PDF-1.6
%âãÏÓ
1 0 obj<>
endobj
2 0 obj<>
endobj
3 0 obj<>
endobj
5 0 obj<>
endobj
7 0 obj<>
endobj
8 0 obj<>>>
endobj
9 0 obj<>
endobj
10 0 obj<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>]/P 9 0 R/S/Article/T()/Pg 11 0 R>>
endobj
11 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
12 0 obj<>
endobj
13 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
14 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
15 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
16 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
17 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
18 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
19 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
20 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
21 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
22 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
23 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
24 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
25 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
26 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
27 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
28 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
29 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
30 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
31 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
32 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
33 0 obj<>
endobj
34 0 obj<>
endobj
35 0 obj<>
endobj
37 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
38 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
40 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
41 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
43 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
44 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
46 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
47 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
49 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
50 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
51 0 obj<>
endobj
53 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
54 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
56 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
57 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
59 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
60 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
62 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
63 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
65 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
66 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
67 0 obj<>
endobj
69 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
70 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
72 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
73 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
75 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
76 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
78 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
79 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
81 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
82 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
83 0 obj<>
endobj
85 0 obj[10 0 R]
endobj
95 0 obj<>
endobj
96 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( BILL )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
(ANALYSIS \
)Tj
( \
)Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 677.283 m
564.274 677.283 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 678.4628 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 661.864 m
510.306 661.864 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 663.0435 Tm
( Page \
1)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( Date of Hearing: August 19, 2008)Tj
T*
( ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Anna Marie Caballero, Chair)Tj
T*
( SB 375 \(Steinberg\) - As Amended: August 18, 2008)Tj
ET
86.275 538.509 m
178.791 538.509 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 539.6889 Tm
( SENATE VOTE : 21-15)Tj
ET
86.275 523.09 m
93.984 523.09 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 524.2696 Tm
( )Tj
ET
9.178 507.671 m
147.952 507.671 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 508.8503 Tm
( SUBJECT : Transportation planning: travel demand models: )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( sustainable communities strategy: environmental review.)Tj
ET
86.275 461.413 m
155.662 461.413 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 462.5924 Tm
( SUMMARY : Requires metropolitan planning organizations \(MP\
Os\) )Tj
T*
(to )Tj
T*
( include sustainable communities strategies \(SCS\), as defined\
, in )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( their regional transportation plans \(RTPs\) for the purpose o\
f )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( reducing greenhouse gas emissions, aligns planning for )Tj
T*
( transportation and housing, and creates specified incentives f\
or )Tj
ET
494.887 368.897 m
579.693 368.897 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 370.0765 Tm
( the implementation of the strategies. Specifically, this bil\
l :)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 1\)Makes findings and declarations concerning the need to make\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( significant changes in land use and transportation policy in\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( order to meet the greenhouse gas reduction goals established\
)Tj
T*
( by AB 32 \(Nunez & Pavley\), Chapter 444, Statutes of 2006.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 2\)Requires the California Air Resources Board \(CARB\), no la\
ter )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( than January 31, 2009, to appoint a Regional Targets Advisor\
y )Tj
T*
( Committee \(committee\) to recommend factors to be considere\
d )Tj
T*
( and methodologies to be used for setting greenhouse gas )Tj
T*
( emission reduction targets for the affected regions, and )Tj
T*
( specifies the composition of the committee, including, but n\
ot )Tj
T*
( limited to, local transportation agencies.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 3\)Requires the committee to transmit a report with its )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( recommendations to CARB no later than December 31, 2009, and\
)Tj
T*
( requires CARB to consider the report prior to setting target\
s.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 4\)Provides that, in recommending factors to be considered and\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( methodologies to be used, the committee may consider any )Tj
T*
( relevant issues, including, but not limited to, data needs, \
)Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(1 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
97 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( modeling techniques, growth forecasts, the impacts of region\
al )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( jobs-housing balance on interregional travel and greenhouse \
)Tj
T*
( gas emissions, economic and demographic trends, the magnitud\
e )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( of greenhouse gas reduction benefits from a variety of land \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( use and transportation strategies, and appropriate methods t\
o )Tj
T*
( describe regional targets and to monitor performance in )Tj
T*
( attaining those targets.)Tj
0 -6 TD
( )Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 523.09 m
564.274 523.09 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 524.2696 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 507.671 m
510.306 507.671 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 508.8503 Tm
( Page \
2)Tj
0 -3.6 TD
( 5\)Requires that, prior to setting the targets for a region, C\
ARB )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( exchange technical information with the MPO and the affected\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( air district, which may include a recommendation for a targe\
t )Tj
T*
( for the region.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 6\)Requires the MPO to hold at least one public workshop withi\
n )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( the region after receipt of the report from the committee.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 7\)Requires CARB to update the regional greenhouse gas emissio\
n )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( reduction targets every eight years consistent with each MPO\
's )Tj
T*
( timeframe for updating its RTP under federal law until 2050.\
)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 8\)Authorizes CARB to revise the targets every four years base\
d )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( on changes in specified factors, and requires CARB to exchan\
ge )Tj
T*
( technical information with the MPOs, local governments, and \
)Tj
T*
( affected air districts and engage in a consultative process \
)Tj
T*
( with public and private stakeholders prior to updating these\
)Tj
T*
( targets.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 9\)Requires the RTP for specified regions to include an SCS, a\
s )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( specified, designed to achieve certain goals for the reducti\
on )Tj
T*
( of greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles and light truck\
s )Tj
T*
( in a region.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 10\)Specifies how the Metropolitan Transportation Commission \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( \(MTC\) and the Association of Bay Area Governments \(ABAG\)\
are )Tj
T*
( to collaborate in the preparation of the SCS.)Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(2 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
98 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( 11\)Specifies how the sub-regional councils of governments wit\
hin )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( the Southern California Association of Governments \(SCAG\) \
will )Tj
T*
( be involved in the preparation of an SCS.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 12\)Requires each MPO to conduct at least two informational )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( meetings in each county within the region for members of the\
)Tj
T*
( board of supervisors and city councils on the SCS and )Tj
T*
( alternative planning strategy \(APS\), if any, subject to )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( specified conditions and exceptions. )Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 13\)Requires each MPO to adopt a public participation plan for\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( development of the SCS and an APS, as specified.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 14\)Requires an MPO to quantify the reduction in greenhouse ga\
s )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( emissions projected to be achieved by the SCS and set forth \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( the difference, if any, between the amount of that reduction\
)Tj
0 -6 TD
( )Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 384.316 m
564.274 384.316 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 385.4958 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 368.897 m
510.306 368.897 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 370.0765 Tm
( Page \
3)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( and the target for the region established by CARB.)Tj
T*
( 15\)Requires that, if an SCS is unable to reach the CARB targe\
t, )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( the MPO prepare an APS to the SCS, as a separate document fr\
om )Tj
T*
( the RTP, showing how those greenhouse gas emission targets \
)Tj
T*
( would be achieved through alternative development patterns, \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( infrastructure, or additional transportation measures or )Tj
T*
( policies, as specified.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 16\)Requires that, prior to starting the public participation \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( process, the MPO submit a description to CARB of the technic\
al )Tj
T*
( methodology it intends to use to estimate the greenhouse gas\
)Tj
T*
( emissions from its SCS and, if appropriate, its APS, and )Tj
T*
( requires CARB to respond to the MPO in a timely manner with \
)Tj
T*
( written comments about the technical methodology, including \
)Tj
T*
( specifically describing any aspects of the methodology that \
)Tj
T*
( will not yield accurate estimates of greenhouse gas emission\
s, )Tj
T*
( and suggested remedies.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 17\)Requires that, after adoption, an MPO submit an SCS or an \
)Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(3 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
99 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( APS, if one has been adopted, to CARB for review, including \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( the quantification of the greenhouse gas emission reductions\
)Tj
T*
( the plan would achieve and a description of the technical )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( methodology used to obtain that result.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 18\)Limits CARB review to acceptance or rejection of the MPO's\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( determination that the strategy submitted would, if )Tj
T*
( implemented, achieve the greenhouse gas emission reduction \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( targets, and require CARB to complete its review within 60 \
)Tj
T*
( days.)Tj
0 -4.8 TD
( 19\)Requires that, if CARB determines that the strategy submit\
ted )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( would not, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse gas emissi\
on )Tj
T*
( reduction targets, the MPO revise its strategy or adopt an \
)Tj
T*
( APS, if not previously adopted, and submit the strategy for \
)Tj
T*
( review.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 20\)Requires, at a minimum, that the MPO must obtain CARB )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( acceptance that an APS would, if implemented, achieve the )Tj
T*
( greenhouse gas emission reduction targets established for th\
at )Tj
T*
( region.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 21\)States that:)Tj
0 -6 TD
( )Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 245.542 m
564.274 245.542 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 246.722 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 230.123 m
510.306 230.123 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 231.3026 Tm
( Page \
4)Tj
0 -3.6 TD
( a\) An SCS or APS does not regulate the use of land, nor \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( shall it be subject to any state approval other than the \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( CARB action referred to above;)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( b\) Nothing in an SCS or APS shall be interpreted as )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( superseding or interfering with the exercise of the land \
)Tj
T*
( use authority of cities and counties within the region;)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( c\) Nothing in this bill shall be interpreted to authoriz\
e )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( the abrogation of any vested right whether created by )Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(4 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
100 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( statute or by common law;)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( d\) Nothing in this bill shall be interpreted to limit )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( CARB'a authority under any other provision of law;)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( e\) Nothing in this bill requires a city or county's land\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( use policies and regulations, including its general plan,\
)Tj
T*
( to be consistent with the RTP or an APS;)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( f\) Nothing in this bill requires an MPO to approve an SC\
S )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( or APS that would be inconsistent with specified federal \
)Tj
T*
( regulations; )Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( g\) Nothing in this bill relieves a public or private ent\
ity )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( or any person from compliance with any other local, state\
, )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( or federal law; and,)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( h\) Nothing in this bill requires a transportation sales \
tax )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( authority, as defined, to change the funding allocations \
)Tj
T*
( approved by the voters for categories of transportation \
)Tj
T*
( projects in a sales tax measure adopted prior to December\
)Tj
T*
( 31, 2010.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 22\)Requires certain transportation planning and programming \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( activities to be consistent with the SCS in order to obtain \
)Tj
T*
( funding, but states that certain transportation projects )Tj
T*
( programmed for funding on or before December 31, 2011, are n\
ot )Tj
T*
( required to be consistent with the SCS.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 23\)Creates a mechanism by which an MPO, or regional )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( transportation agency not within an MPO, that is currently o\
n )Tj
T*
( a five-year RTP cycle may elect to adopt an RTP on a four-ye\
ar )Tj
T*
( cycle in order to conform with the other provisions of this \
)Tj
T*
( bill.)Tj
0 -6 TD
( )Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 106.769 m
564.274 106.769 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 107.9481 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 91.349 m
510.306 91.349 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 92.5288 Tm
( Page \
5)Tj
0 -3.6 TD
( 24\)Authorizes MPOs in specified Central Valley counties to wo\
rk )Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(5 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
101 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( together to develop and adopt multi-regional goals and prepa\
re )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( multi-regional SCS.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 25\)Adds areas designated for agricultural uses and agricultur\
al )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( elements of general plans to the definition of "resource )Tj
T*
( areas.")Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 26\)Defines "consistent" as having the same meaning as in a )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( specified provision of federal law, and define "internally \
)Tj
T*
( consistent" as meaning that the elements of the RTP must be \
)Tj
T*
( consistent with one another.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 27\)Requires that, prior to and after the adoption of specifie\
d )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( forms, the housing element portion of the annual progress )Tj
T*
( report of a planning agency on implementation of its general\
)Tj
T*
( plans must include a section that describes the actions take\
n )Tj
T*
( by the local government towards completion of the programs a\
nd )Tj
T*
( status of the local government's compliance with the deadlin\
es )Tj
T*
( in its housing element.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 28\)Changes the regional housing needs allocation \(RHNA\) cyc\
le )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( from five years to eight years.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 29\)Requires that rezoning of sites needed to meet RHNA )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( requirements, including adoption of minimum density and )Tj
T*
( development standards, shall be completed no later than thre\
e )Tj
T*
( years after either the date the housing element is adopted o\
r )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( the date that is 90 days after receipt of comments from the \
)Tj
T*
( Department of Housing and Community Development \(HCD\), )Tj
T*
( whichever is earlier, unless this deadline is extended, as \
)Tj
T*
( specified.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 30\)Requires a local government that has failed to adopt a )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( housing element within 120 days of the statutory deadline fo\
r )Tj
T*
( doing so to complete the rezoning of sufficient RHNA sites n\
o )Tj
T*
( later than three years and 120 days from the deadline to ado\
pt )Tj
T*
( its housing element.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 31\)Allows the deadline for completing required rezoning to be\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( extended by one year if the local government has completed \
)Tj
T*
( rezoning at densities sufficient to accommodate at least 75%\
)Tj
T*
( of the sites for each income group and if the legislative bo\
dy )Tj
T*
( at the conclusion of a public hearing determines, based upon\
)Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(6 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
102 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( )Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 692.703 m
564.274 692.703 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 693.8821 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 677.283 m
510.306 677.283 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 678.4628 Tm
( Page \
6)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( substantial evidence, makes specified findings.)Tj
T*
( 32\)Prohibits a local government that fails to complete the )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( rezoning by the deadline, as it may be extended, from )Tj
T*
( disapproving a housing development project, or requiring a \
)Tj
T*
( conditional use permit, planned unit development permit, or \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( other locally imposed discretionary permit or condition that\
)Tj
T*
( would render the project infeasible, if the housing )Tj
T*
( development project is proposed to be located on a site )Tj
T*
( required to be rezoned pursuant to the program required by \
)Tj
T*
( that subparagraph and complies with applicable, objective )Tj
T*
( general plan and zoning standards and criteria, including )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( design review standards, described in the program required b\
y )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( that subparagraph.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 33\)Provides that any such subdivision of sites shall be subje\
ct )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( to the Subdivision Map Act but shall not constitute a )Tj
T*
( "project" for purposes of the California Environmental Quali\
ty )Tj
T*
( Act \(CEQA\).)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 34\)Provides that a local government that fails to complete it\
s )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( rezoning may disapprove a housing development described in \
)Tj
T*
( paragraph only if it makes written findings supported by )Tj
T*
( substantial evidence on the record that the housing )Tj
T*
( development project would have a specific, adverse impact up\
on )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( the public health or safety unless the project is disapprove\
d )Tj
T*
( or approved upon the condition that the project be developed\
)Tj
T*
( at a lower density, and that there is no feasible method to \
)Tj
T*
( satisfactorily mitigate or avoid the adverse impact other th\
an )Tj
T*
( the disapproval of the housing development project or the )Tj
T*
( approval of the project upon the condition that it be )Tj
T*
( developed at a lower density.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 35\)Permits the applicant or any interested person to bring an\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( action to enforce these provisions, and specifies that if a \
)Tj
T*
( court finds that the local agency disapproved a project or \
)Tj
T*
( conditioned its approval in violation of these provisions, t\
he )Tj
T*
( court shall issue an order or judgment compelling compliance\
)Tj
T*
( within 60 days, retain jurisdiction to ensure that its order\
)Tj
T*
( or judgment is carried out, and, if it determines that its \
)Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(7 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
103 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( order or judgment has not been carried out within 60 days, t\
he )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( court may issue further orders to ensure that the purposes a\
nd )Tj
T*
( policies of this paragraph are fulfilled.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 36\)Provides that, in an action brought against a local )Tj
0 -6 TD
( )Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 553.929 m
564.274 553.929 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 555.1083 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 538.509 m
510.306 538.509 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 539.6889 Tm
( Page \
7)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( government for failing to complete rezoning, the burden of \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( proof shall be borne by the local government.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 37\)Defines "housing development project" as a project to )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( construct residential units if the project developer provide\
s )Tj
T*
( sufficient legal commitments to the appropriate local agency\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( to ensure the continued availability and use of at least 49%\
)Tj
T*
( of the housing units for very low-, low-, and moderate-incom\
e )Tj
T*
( households at monthly housing costs with an affordable housi\
ng )Tj
T*
( cost or affordable rent, as defined, for the period required\
)Tj
T*
( by the applicable financing.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 38\)Specifies that rental units shall be affordable for at lea\
st )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( 55 years, and that ownership units shall be subject to resal\
e )Tj
T*
( restrictions or equity sharing requirements for at least 30 \
)Tj
T*
( years.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 39\)Requires that a council of governments \(COG\) provide HCD\
with )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( data assumptions about the relationship between jobs and )Tj
T*
( housing in the region, if available, to assist HCD in )Tj
T*
( determining the region's RHNA.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 40\)States legislative intent that:)Tj
T*
( a\) Housing planning be coordinated and integrated with t\
he )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( RTP;)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( b\) To achieve this goal, the allocation plan shall alloc\
ate )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( housing units within the region consistent with the )Tj
T*
( development pattern included in the SCS;)Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(8 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
104 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( c\) The final allocation plan shall ensure that the total\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( regional housing need, by income category, is maintained,\
)Tj
T*
( and that each jurisdiction in the region receive an )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( allocation of units for low- and very low-income )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( households; and,)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( d\) The resolution approving the final housing need )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( allocation plan shall demonstrate that the plan is )Tj
T*
( consistent with the SCS in the RTP.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 41\)Directs a court that finds that a city, county, or city an\
d )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( county has failed to complete the required rezoning, as that\
)Tj
T*
( deadline may be extended, to issue an order or judgment )Tj
T*
( compelling the local government to complete the rezoning )Tj
0 -6 TD
( )Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 415.155 m
564.274 415.155 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 416.3344 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 399.736 m
510.306 399.736 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 400.9151 Tm
( Page \
8)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( within 60 days or the earliest time consistent with public \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( hearing notice requirements in place at the time the action \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( was filed and the overall equities of the circumstances as \
)Tj
T*
( presented by all parties, to retain jurisdiction to ensure \
)Tj
T*
( that its order or judgment is carried out, and, if the court\
)Tj
T*
( determines that its order or judgment is not carried out, to\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( issue further orders, including ordering that any required \
)Tj
T*
( rezoning be completed within 60 days or the earliest time )Tj
T*
( consistent with public hearing notice requirements, and may \
)Tj
T*
( impose sanctions on the city, county, or city and county, )Tj
T*
( taking into account the overall equities of the circumstance\
s )Tj
T*
( presented by all parties.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 42\)Permits any interested person to bring an action to compel\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( compliance with the specified deadlines and requirements, an\
d )Tj
T*
( specify that in any such action, the city, county, or city a\
nd )Tj
T*
( county shall bear the burden of proof.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 43\)Requires a local government that does not adopt a housing \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( element within 90 days after receipt of comments from HCD on\
)Tj
T*
( its draft housing element, or the date the legislative body \
)Tj
T*
( takes action subsequent to HCD determining that the draft )Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(9 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
105 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( housing element does not substantially comply, whichever is \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( earlier, to revise its housing element as appropriate, but n\
ot )Tj
T*
( less than every four years, rather than eight years.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 44\)Requires all local governments within an MPO in a )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( non-attainment region, other than those within the )Tj
T*
( jurisdiction of the San Diego Association of Governments )Tj
T*
( \(SANDAG\), to adopt the fifth revision of their housing )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( elements no later than 18 months after the adoption of the \
)Tj
T*
( first RTP to be adopted after September 30, 2010.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 45\)Requires local governments within SANDAG to adopt their fi\
fth )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( revision no later than five years from the fourth revision, \
)Tj
T*
( and their sixth revision no later than 18 months after the \
)Tj
T*
( adoption of the first RTP to be adopted after the fifth )Tj
T*
( revision due date.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 46\)Requires local governments within an MPO that has elected \
to )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( move from a five-year to a four-year RTP cycle to adopt an \
)Tj
T*
( eight-year RHNA cycle and to adopt their next housing elemen\
ts )Tj
T*
( 18 months after the adoption of the first RTP after the )Tj
T*
( election.)Tj
0 -7.2 TD
( )Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 276.381 m
564.274 276.381 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 277.5606 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 260.962 m
510.306 260.962 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 262.1413 Tm
( Page \
9)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 47\)Defines "planning period" as the time period for periodic \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( revision of a jurisdiction's housing element.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 48\)Specifies that, with one exception, the Implementation of \
the )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Sustainable Communities Strategy chapter of CEQA applies onl\
y )Tj
T*
( to a transit priority project that is consistent with the )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( general use designation, density, building intensity, and )Tj
T*
( applicable policies specified for the project area in either\
)Tj
T*
( an SCS or an APS, for which CARB has accepted an MPO's )Tj
T*
( determination that the SCS or APS would, if implemented, )Tj
T*
( achieve the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 49\)Requires a transit priority project to: )Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(10 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
106 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 740.1401 Tm
( a\) Contain at least 50% residential use, based on total \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( building square footage and, if the project contains )Tj
T*
( between 26% and 50% nonresidential uses, a floor area rat\
io )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( of not less than 0.75;)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( b\) Provide a minimum net density of at least 20 dwelling\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( units per acre; and, )Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( c\) Be within one-half mile of an existing or planned maj\
or )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( transit stop, as defined, or high-quality transit corrido\
r, )Tj
T*
( as defined, as set forth in the applicable regional )Tj
T*
( transportation plan.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 50\)Specifies that, for purposes of defining a transit priorit\
y )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( project, all parcels within the project have no more than 25\
% )Tj
T*
( of their area farther than mile from a transit stop or )Tj
T*
( corridor and )Tj
0 -3.6 TD
( that no more than 10% or 100 residential units, whichever is \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( less are less than mile from a transit stop or corridor. )Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 51\)Provides that no additional review is required pursuant to\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( CEQA for a transit priority project if the legislative body \
of )Tj
T*
( a local jurisdiction finds, after conducting a public hearin\
g, )Tj
T*
( that the project meets specified criteria and is declared to\
)Tj
T*
( be a sustainable communities project.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 52\)Requires that in the initial study for a sustainable )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( communities environmental assessment or environmental impact\
)Tj
T*
( report \(EIR\) for a transit priority project that has met \
)Tj
0 -6 TD
( )Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 137.607 m
564.274 137.607 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 138.7867 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 122.188 m
510.306 122.188 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 123.3674 Tm
( Page \
10)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( specified criteria, the lead agency shall determine whether \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( cumulative impacts have been both adequately addressed and \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( adequately mitigated in prior certified EIRs.)Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(11 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
107 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( 53\)Authorizes the legislative body of a local jurisdiction to\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( adopt traffic mitigation measures for future residential )Tj
T*
( projects that meet specified criteria, and exempts such a )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( residential project seeking a land use approval from )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( compliance with additional measures for traffic impacts, if \
)Tj
T*
( the local jurisdiction has adopted those traffic mitigation \
)Tj
T*
( measures.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 54\)Specifies that, if a residential or mixed-use residential \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( project is consistent with the use designation, density, )Tj
T*
( building intensity, and applicable policies specified for th\
e )Tj
T*
( project area in either an SCS or an APS, for which CARB has \
)Tj
T*
( accepted the MPO's determination that the SCS or the APS )Tj
T*
( would, if implemented, achieve the greenhouse gas emission \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( reduction targets and if the project incorporates the )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( mitigation measures required by an applicable prior )Tj
T*
( environmental document, any findings or other determinations\
)Tj
T*
( for an exemption, a negative declaration, a mitigated negati\
ve )Tj
T*
( declaration, an EIR, or addenda prepared or adopted for the \
)Tj
T*
( project pursuant to CEQA shall not be required to reference,\
)Tj
T*
( describe, or discuss growth inducing impacts or any project \
)Tj
T*
( specific or cumulative impacts from cars and light-duty truc\
k )Tj
T*
( trips generated by the project on global warming or the )Tj
T*
( regional transportation network.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 55\)Specifies that any EIR prepared for a project described ab\
ove )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( shall not be required to reference, describe, or discuss a \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( reduced residential density alternative to address the effec\
ts )Tj
T*
( of car and light-duty truck trips generated by the project.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 56\)Defines "regional transportation network" as all existing \
and )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( proposed transportation improvements that were included in t\
he )Tj
T*
( transportation and air quality conformity modeling, includin\
g )Tj
T*
( congestion modeling, for the final RTP adopted by the MPO, b\
ut )Tj
T*
( shall not include local streets and roads. )Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 57\)Specifies that nothing in the foregoing relieves any proje\
ct )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( from a requirement to comply with any conditions, exactions,\
)Tj
T*
( or fees for the mitigation of the project's impacts on the \
)Tj
T*
( regional transportation network or local streets and roads.)Tj
0 -7.2 TD
( )Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(12 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
108 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 723.541 m
564.274 723.541 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 724.7207 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 708.122 m
510.306 708.122 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 709.3014 Tm
( Page \
11)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 58\)Defines a "residential or mixed-use residential project" a\
s a )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( project where at least 75% of the total building square )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( footage of the project consists of residential use or a \
)Tj
T*
( project that is a transit priority project.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 59\)States that, if the Commission on State Mandates determine\
s )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( that this bill contains costs mandated by the state, )Tj
T*
( reimbursement to local agencies and school districts for tho\
se )Tj
T*
( costs shall be made pursuant applicable sections of the )Tj
T*
( Government Code.)Tj
ET
86.275 507.671 m
194.21 507.671 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 508.8503 Tm
( EXISTING LAW :)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 1\)Requires certain transportation planning activities by the \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( California Department of Transportation and by designated )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( regional transportation planning agencies, including )Tj
T*
( development of an RTP.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 2\)Authorizes CTC, in cooperation with the regional agencies, \
to )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( prescribe study areas for analysis and evaluation.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 3\)Requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to\
be )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( prepared, and certify the completion of, an EIR on a project\
)Tj
T*
( that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a )Tj
T*
( significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative\
)Tj
T*
( declaration if it finds that the project will not have that \
)Tj
T*
( effect.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 4\)Requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( declaration for a project that may have a significant effect\
)Tj
T*
( on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid o\
r )Tj
T*
( mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence th\
at )Tj
T*
( the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on \
)Tj
T*
( the environment.)Tj
ET
86.275 137.607 m
201.92 137.607 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 138.7867 Tm
( FISCAL EFFECT : According to the Assembly Appropriations )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Committee's July 17, 2007, analysis:)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 1\)CTC would incur one-time costs of up to $200,000 in 2007-08\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( for the adoption of modeling guidelines. Potential minor )Tj
T*
( ongoing costs associated with updated guidelines and reviews\
)Tj
T*
( of regional models.)Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(13 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
109 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 740.1401 Tm
( 2\)CARB would require one-half of an additional personnel year\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( \(PY\) in 2007-08 and 2008-09 \(annual costs of $72,500\), a\
nd a )Tj
0 -6 TD
( )Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 584.767 m
564.274 584.767 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 585.9469 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 569.348 m
510.306 569.348 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 570.5276 Tm
( Page \
12)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( full additional PY thereafter \(annual cost of $145,000\) fo\
r )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( the workload associated with this bill.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 3\)The requirement that regional transportation planning agenc\
ies )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( develop enhanced travel demand models and preferred growth \
)Tj
T*
( scenarios may result in a reimbursable state mandate, )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( potentially resulting in state costs exceeding several )Tj
T*
( millions of dollars.)Tj
ET
86.275 399.736 m
163.371 399.736 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 400.9151 Tm
( COMMENTS : )Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 1\)According to the author, this bill provides a mechanism for\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( reducing greenhouse gases from the single largest sector of \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( emissions, cars and light trucks. The environmental )Tj
T*
( organizations sponsoring this legislation maintain that )Tj
T*
( changes in land use and transportation policy must be made t\
o )Tj
T*
( achieve the goals of AB 32. Although greenhouse gas emissio\
ns )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( can be reduced by producing more fuel efficient cars and usi\
ng )Tj
T*
( low carbon fuel, reductions in vehicle miles traveled will \
)Tj
T*
( also be necessary. Thus, the travel demand models used by \
)Tj
T*
( MPOs to develop RTPs must assess the effects of land use )Tj
T*
( decisions, transit service, and economic incentives. )Tj
T*
( According to the author, this bill will help implement AB 32\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( by amending programs that are beyond the current authority o\
f )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( ARB. SB 375 integrates and aligns planning for housing, lan\
d )Tj
T*
( use, transportation and greenhouse gas emissions for the 17 \
)Tj
T*
( MPOs in the state through amendments to provisions in existi\
ng )Tj
T*
( law in three major areas.)Tj
ET
86.275 91.349 m
340.693 91.349 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 92.5288 Tm
( 2\)Regional Transportation Plans . SB 375 requires CARB, af\
ter )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( considering the recommendations from a broadly based advisor\
y )Tj
T*
( committee, to provide targets to the MPOs for greenhouse gas\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( emission reductions for cars and light duty truck trips from\
)Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(14 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
110 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( the regional land use and transportation system by July 1, \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( 2010. Each MPO, through significant involvement with the )Tj
T*
( public and its member cities and counties, will then prepare\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( an SCS as a component of its RTP that meets the target, if \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( feasible. It must use transportation and air emission )Tj
T*
( modeling techniques consistent with guidelines prepared by C\
TC )Tj
T*
( to document the greenhouse gas emissions. If the SCS does n\
ot )Tj
T*
( meet the target, the MPO must adopt an APS, as a separate )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( document from the RTP that does. However, the MPO is not )Tj
T*
( required to implement the APS because it may include amounts\
)Tj
T*
( of transportation funding and changes to land use patterns \
)Tj
T*
( that go beyond what federal law allows. CARB may accept or \
)Tj
0 -6 TD
( )Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 445.993 m
564.274 445.993 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 447.173 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 430.574 m
510.306 430.574 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 431.7537 Tm
( Page \
13)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( reject the MPO's determination that the SCS or APS meets the\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( target, but it does not approve the SCS or APS and it may no\
t )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( suggest or require that the MPO make changes to either )Tj
T*
( document. The adopted RTP must be an "internally consistent\
" )Tj
T*
( document, and current requirements that transportation funds\
)Tj
T*
( may only be spent on projects consistent with the RTP are )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( unchanged. Projects already programmed in the Statewide )Tj
T*
( Transportation Improvement Program \(STIP\) through 2011, an\
d )Tj
T*
( projects, programs, and categories of projects in any county\
)Tj
T*
( sales tax measure approved by the voters prior to December, \
)Tj
T*
( 2010 are expressly exempted from the provisions of the bill.\
)Tj
T*
( Several safeguards in the bill are included to preserve loca\
l )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( government land use authority.)Tj
ET
86.275 183.865 m
379.242 183.865 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 185.0447 Tm
( 3\)Regional Housing Needs Assessments . Each MPO would be \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( required to update RHNA every eight years instead of every \
)Tj
T*
( five years as required by current law. This will allow the \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( RHNA process to align with updates to the RTPs, which federa\
l )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( law requires to be done every four years. SB 375 amends the\
)Tj
T*
( HCD process for setting the regional housing allocations for\
)Tj
T*
( MPOs to encourage planning for sufficient housing for the )Tj
T*
( projected employment growth in a region. The MPO's allocati\
on )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( of RHNA shares to each of the cities and counties in its )Tj
T*
( jurisdiction will be required to be consistent with the SCS.\
)Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(15 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
111 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( Local governments would be required to rezone sites to be )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( consistent with their updated housing elements within three \
)Tj
T*
( years \(four years if the local government has completed 75%\
of )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( its rezoning by the third year and meets one of three )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( conditions: circumstances out of its control, lack of )Tj
T*
( infrastructure to serve the sites, or need for a major updat\
e )Tj
T*
( to its general plan to meet its RHNA allocation\). If a loc\
al )Tj
T*
( government does not update its housing element within 120 da\
ys )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( of the statutory deadline, it will be required to update its\
)Tj
T*
( RHNA every four years.)Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
86.275 584.767 m
394.661 584.767 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 585.9469 Tm
( 4\)California Environmental Quality Act . Residential and \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( mixed-use projects that are consistent with an SCS or APS th\
at )Tj
T*
( CARB accepts as meeting its greenhouse gas target will not \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( have to be analyzed under CEQA for growth-inducing impacts o\
r )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( impacts on global warming or on the regional transportation \
)Tj
T*
( network. A lead agency would not be required to consider a \
)Tj
T*
( reduced density alternative because of car and light duty )Tj
T*
( truck trips. A limited set of projects that meet a very )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( stringent series of environmental and other criteria would b\
e )Tj
T*
( exempt from any CEQA analysis. Limited CEQA review would be\
)Tj
0 -6 TD
( )Tj
ET
510.306 307.22 m
564.274 307.22 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 308.3992 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 291.8 m
510.306 291.8 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 292.9799 Tm
( Page \
14)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( available to projects with a density of 20 dwelling units/ac\
re )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( that are within 1/2 mile of current or planned high quality \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( transit service for any impacts that are sufficiently analyz\
ed )Tj
T*
( and mitigated in the RTP's EIR. Finally, qualifying local \
)Tj
T*
( governments would be able to establish their own mitigation \
)Tj
T*
( standards for local traffic impacts.)Tj
ET
86.275 137.607 m
248.178 137.607 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 138.7867 Tm
( 5\)Recent amendments . After long and intense negotiations \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( between the author and stakeholders, the current August 13, \
)Tj
T*
( 2008 version of SB 375 incorporates numerous amendments that\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( address concerns raised by this Committee and various )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( stakeholder groups. The application of the bill has been )Tj
T*
( limited to federally-designated metropolitan planning areas,\
)Tj
T*
( thus eliminating some small counties. The Regional Targets \
)Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(16 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
112 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 710.5864 Tm
( \
)Tj
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 -2.352 TD
( )Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(26 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
113 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( Advisory Committee has been created to consider various )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( technical issues and to recommend greenhouse gas emission )Tj
T*
( reduction targets for the regions. A new provision makes )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( consideration of local general plans explicit in the )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( development of a sustainable communities strategy. The )Tj
T*
( planning priority provisions found in earlier iterations of \
)Tj
T*
( the bill, which have been criticized as creating "concentric\
)Tj
T*
( circles," have been eliminated. The regions will "gather an\
d )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( consider" information about, rather than identify, important\
)Tj
T*
( resources and farmlands. The document formerly referred to \
as )Tj
T*
( the "supplement" is now the APS. This is intended to clarif\
y )Tj
T*
( further that this document is not a part of the sustainable \
)Tj
T*
( communities strategy nor the RTP. New provisions require an \
)Tj
T*
( APS to include the most practicable policies for actually )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( achieving the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. An\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( MPO will be required to submit its SCS/APS to CARB for its \
)Tj
T*
( certification that the strategy, if implemented, would )Tj
T*
( actually achieve the emission targets. A new rural )Tj
T*
( sustainability element is added to the RTP authorizing regio\
ns )Tj
T*
( to consider financial incentives for jurisdictions that have\
)Tj
T*
( resource areas or farmlands and contribute to GHG reductions\
)Tj
T*
( by encouraging growth within the urban footprint. The )Tj
T*
( definitions of resource areas and farmlands have been )Tj
T*
( modified. An important change eliminates certain descriptio\
ns )Tj
T*
( of habitat areas and substitutes the phrase "biological )Tj
T*
( resources" as defined in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. \
)Tj
T*
( Changes have been made to the modeling provisions reflecting\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( the adoption of the new guidelines by the CTC.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 6\)Concerning CEQA, the requirement that a local government wo\
uld )Tj
0 -6 TD
( )Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 168.446 m
564.274 168.446 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 169.6254 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 153.026 m
510.306 153.026 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 154.2061 Tm
( Page \
15)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( have to amend its general plan to be consistent with an SCS \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( before being eligible for CEQA-related benefits has been )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( deleted. The CEQA provisions of the bill are now all )Tj
T*
( project-specific. New provisions are added to CEQA that wou\
ld )Tj
T*
( apply to residential or residential mixed use projects that \
)Tj
T*
( were consistent with a CARB certified SCS/APS. These )Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(17 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
114 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( projects would not have to analyze their growth inducing )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( impacts or their impacts on global warming or on the regiona\
l )Tj
T*
( transportation network. A lead agency would not be required\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( to address a reduced density alternative because of car and \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( light duty truck trips. These provisions address concerns \
)Tj
T*
( raised by this Committee last year that the CEQA provisions \
of )Tj
T*
( SB 375 were insufficiently "user-friendly." The provisions \
of )Tj
T*
( CEQA in the March 24 version of this bill would now apply on\
ly )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( to projects that were consistent with a CARB certified SCS/A\
PS )Tj
T*
( and that were "transit priority projects." The sponsors of \
)Tj
T*
( this bill refer to the criteria a project would have to meet\
)Tj
T*
( in order to obtain full exemption as a sustainable communiti\
es )Tj
T*
( project as the "platinum standard" that is intentionally har\
d )Tj
T*
( to achieve. However, with the addition of the new provision\
s, )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( less onerous alternatives now exist by which projects may )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( obtain significant, if only partial, relief from CEQA )Tj
T*
( obligations.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( 7\)Perhaps the biggest change to SB 375 made by the August 13 \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( amendments is the incorporation of RHNA into the framework o\
f )Tj
T*
( the bill. The amendments align the RHNA and RTP processes b\
y )Tj
T*
( requiring that the housing element be updated every eight )Tj
T*
( years rather than its current five-year cycle. A new )Tj
T*
( statutory deadline for completing rezoning would be added to\
)Tj
T*
( the RHNA process. If a local government failed to rezone )Tj
T*
( within the new deadline, remedies would be created for )Tj
T*
( affordable housing development projects and for a writ of )Tj
0 -3.6 TD
( mandate to compel rezoning. The proponents believe that, in \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( addition to the land use and )Tj
T*
( greenhouse gas reduction benefits, the net benefits of the bil\
l )Tj
T*
( to the planning and construction of affordable housing are \
)Tj
T*
( significant.)Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
86.275 214.704 m
263.597 214.704 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 215.8833 Tm
( 8\)Proposed Amendments . The Committee and author may wish \
to )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( consider two other amendments to SB 375 to address subjects \
of )Tj
T*
( continued concern:)Tj
0 -7.2 TD
( )Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(18 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
115 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 754.38 m
564.274 754.38 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 738.96 m
510.306 738.96 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 740.1401 Tm
( Page \
16)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( a\) Government Code Sec. 65400\(a\)\(2\)\(B\). As propos\
ed to be )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( amended, the bill will require that "[p]rior to and after\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( adoption of the forms, the housing element portion of the\
)Tj
T*
( annual report shall include a section that describes the \
)Tj
T*
( actions taken by the local government towards completion \
of )Tj
T*
( the programs and status of the local government's )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( compliance with the deadlines in its housing element." T\
he )Tj
T*
( first sentence of this paragraph states that, "[t]he )Tj
T*
( housing element portion of the annual report, as required\
)Tj
T*
( by this paragraph, shall be prepared through the use of \
)Tj
T*
( forms and definitions adopted by the Department of Housin\
g )Tj
T*
( and Community Development pursuant to the rulemaking )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act." These \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( forms have never been adopted in the 13 years since this \
)Tj
T*
( provision became law. The statute seems to be clear that\
)Tj
T*
( the existence of the forms is a necessary precondition to\
)Tj
T*
( the existence of the report, at least as far as the housi\
ng )Tj
T*
( element portion is concerned. Consequently, no report ca\
n )Tj
T*
( exist prior to the existence of the forms, so the provisi\
on )Tj
T*
( in SB 375 positing that there could be a housing element \
)Tj
T*
( portion of the annual report in which the desired )Tj
T*
( information can be reported prior to the adoption of the \
)Tj
T*
( forms is absurd. The Committee may wish to request that \
)Tj
T*
( the author delete the words "prior to and after adoption \
of )Tj
T*
( the forms" from SB 375.)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( b\) Government Code Sec. 65583\(c\)\(1\)\(A\). As propos\
ed to be )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( amended, SB 375 requires a local government that has fail\
ed )Tj
T*
( to adopt a housing element within 120 days of the statuto\
ry )Tj
T*
( deadline for doing so to complete the rezoning of )Tj
T*
( sufficient RHNA sites no later than three years and 120 \
)Tj
T*
( days from the deadline to adopt its housing element. The\
)Tj
T*
( question arises as to why a delinquent jurisdiction is )Tj
T*
( being given an additional two months to complete its )Tj
T*
( rezoning. The Committee may wish to ask the author to )Tj
T*
( delete the 120-day addendum and require the jurisdiction \
to )Tj
T*
( complete its rezoning within three years.)Tj
ET
86.275 122.188 m
248.178 122.188 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 123.3674 Tm
( 9\)Further Questions . The Committee may wish to ask the au\
thor )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( and proponents of SB 375 to address the following questions:\
)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( a\) While the language of SB 375 has changed to no longer\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( explicitly state that transportation funding will be )Tj
T*
( withheld from MPOs that fail to adopt an SCS/APS, the )Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(19 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
116 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( effect still seems to be the same. In the past, the auth\
or )Tj
0 -6 TD
( )Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 615.606 m
564.274 615.606 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 616.7855 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 600.187 m
510.306 600.187 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 601.3662 Tm
( Page \
17)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( and sponsors of SB 375 have referred to this provision of\
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( the bill as an "incentive," which appears to do violence \
to )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( the commonly accepted meaning of that word. Does SB 375 \
in )Tj
T*
( fact create a penalty for jurisdictions that choose not t\
o )Tj
T*
( follow its provisions? Does this penalty consist of the \
)Tj
T*
( withholding of funds for which the jurisdiction is )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( currently eligible? If an MPO creates an SCS/APS but fai\
ls )Tj
T*
( to meet its target, are there consequences in terms of )Tj
T*
( transportation funding?)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( b\) This leads to a second area of concern. SB 375 state\
s )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( that an SCS or APS does not regulate the use of land, nor\
)Tj
T*
( shall it be subject to any state approval other than the \
)Tj
T*
( CARB action referred to above; that nothing in an SCS or \
)Tj
T*
( APS shall be interpreted as )Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( superseding or interfering with the exercise of the land us\
e )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( authority of cities and counties within the region; and \
)Tj
T*
( that nothing in the bill requires a city's or county's la\
nd )Tj
T*
( use policies and regulations, including its general plan,\
)Tj
T*
( to be consistent with the RTP or an APS. However, while \
)Tj
T*
( fulfilling the provisions of SB 375 is technically )Tj
T*
( voluntary in many cases, it appears that the reality may \
be )Tj
T*
( different. How can an MPO create a CARB-acceptable SCS/A\
PS )Tj
T*
( without involving local general plans and other land use \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( policies? How is an SCS going to work at the ground leve\
l? )Tj
T*
( Will the targets created by CARB carry the legal force o\
f )Tj
T*
( regulations? Will the prospect of the loss of funds for \
)Tj
T*
( locally significant transportation projects create a de \
)Tj
T*
( facto coercive pressure on local governments? While one \
)Tj
T*
( hopes that the admirable example of the Sacramento Area \
)Tj
T*
( Council of Governments \(SACOG\) bringing jurisdictions \
)Tj
T*
( together to create a regional blueprint on a voluntary )Tj
T*
( basis can be replicated, what happens in areas where )Tj
T*
( inter-governmental relationships are not so relatively )Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(20 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
117 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( benign?)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( c\) Another issue that the Committee may also wish the )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( author and proponents of SB 375 to address is the impact \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( and benefit of the bill on rural jurisdictions. While SB\
)Tj
T*
( 375 has been amended to include agriculture in the )Tj
T*
( definition of resource areas and require MPOs to consider\
)Tj
T*
( so-called "rural sustainability" incentives, it is unclea\
r )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( whether the bill adequately recognizes that the types of \
)Tj
T*
( actions that agricultural regions may be asked to take in\
)Tj
0 -6 TD
( )Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
510.306 476.832 m
564.274 476.832 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 478.0117 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 461.413 m
510.306 461.413 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 462.5924 Tm
( Page \
18)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( order to meet greenhouse gas emissions targets are very \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( different from those undertaken in more urbanized areas. \
)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Will communities with farmers and ranchers who have been \
)Tj
T*
( engaged in carbon emission-reducing, environmentally )Tj
T*
( beneficial practices for years receive adequate credit fo\
r )Tj
T*
( these achievements? Regarding SB 375's CEQA provisions, \
it )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( appears that it will be nearly impossible for many smalle\
r )Tj
T*
( cities in agricultural counties to meet the definition of\
)Tj
T*
( "transit priority projects" or otherwise avail themselves\
)Tj
T*
( of the relief from CEQA obligations offered by this bill.\
)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( d\) Finally, some even larger questions have arisen durin\
g )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( the evolution of SB 375. Does the bill create significan\
t )Tj
T*
( new levels of government, so that its efforts at )Tj
T*
( streamlining the planning process may have the unintended\
)Tj
T*
( effect of making it more unwieldy? Is the timeline for \
)Tj
T*
( achievement of the bill's goals too compressed for many \
)Tj
T*
( local governments? Should the means of achieving the goa\
ls )Tj
T*
( of the bill be more of an iterative, ongoing process with\
)Tj
T*
( extensive give-and-take between the policy makers in )Tj
T*
( Sacramento and the local jurisdictions doing the work of \
)Tj
T*
( implementing the policies on the ground on what works and\
)Tj
T*
( what doesn't? )Tj
ET
86.275 60.511 m
340.693 60.511 l
S
363.822 60.511 m
371.532 60.511 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 61.6902 Tm
( REGISTERED SUPPORT / OPPOSITION : )Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(21 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
118 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
9.178 754.38 m
140.242 754.38 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( Support)Tj
ET
9.178 723.541 m
86.275 723.541 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 724.7207 Tm
( CA League of Conservation Voters [CO-SPONSOR])Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Natural Resources Defense Council [CO-SPONSOR])Tj
T*
( Alpine Meadows)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( American Farmland Trust)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( American Lung Association of CA)Tj
T*
( American Planning Association, CA Chapter)Tj
T*
( Association of Bay Area Governments)Tj
ET
86.275 584.767 m
240.468 584.767 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 585.9469 Tm
( Support \(continued\))Tj
ET
9.178 569.348 m
86.275 569.348 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 570.5276 Tm
( )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Audubon CA)Tj
T*
( Bay Area Council \(in concept\))Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Bay Area Air Quality Management District)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Breathe CA)Tj
T*
( CA Association of Environmental Professionals \(if amended\))Tj
T*
( CA Association of Local Area Formation Commissions)Tj
0 -6 TD
( )Tj
ET
510.306 338.058 m
564.274 338.058 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 339.2378 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 322.639 m
510.306 322.639 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 323.8185 Tm
( Page \
19)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( CA Building Industry Association)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( CA Council of Land Trusts)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( CA Interfaith Power and Light)Tj
T*
( CA League of Conservation Voters)Tj
T*
( CA Major Builders Council)Tj
T*
( CA Nurses Association)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( CA Professional Firefighters)Tj
T*
( CA State Association of Counties)Tj
T*
( Cities of Citrus Heights, Folsom, Huntington Beach, Roseville,\
)Tj
T*
( and Sacramento)Tj
T*
( Coalition for Clean Air)Tj
T*
( Congress for a New Urbanism)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( County of Los Angeles)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( County of Napa \(with amendments\))Tj
T*
( Defenders of Wildlife)Tj
T*
( Endangered Habitats League)Tj
T*
( Environment CA)Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(22 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
119 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( Environmental Defense Fund)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Environmental Entrepreneurs)Tj
T*
( Ford Motor Company)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Fulcrum Properties)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Health Officers Association of CA)Tj
T*
( Homewood Mountain Resort)Tj
T*
( JMA Ventures)Tj
T*
( League of CA Cities)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( League of Women Voters)Tj
T*
( Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa)Tj
T*
( Merced/Mariposa County Asthma Coalition)Tj
T*
( Metropolitan Transportation Commission of San Francisco Bay Ar\
ea)Tj
T*
( Moller International)Tj
T*
( Natural Resources Defense Council)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( New Voice of Business)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Non Profit Housing Association of Northern California)Tj
T*
( Pacific Gas and Electric Company)Tj
T*
( Planning and Conservation League)Tj
T*
( Sacramento Area Fire Fighters, Local 522)Tj
T*
( Sacramento Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce)Tj
T*
( Sacramento Regional Transit District)Tj
T*
( San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom)Tj
T*
( Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission)Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
86.275 368.897 m
240.468 368.897 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 370.0765 Tm
( Support \(continued\))Tj
ET
9.178 353.478 m
86.275 353.478 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 354.6572 Tm
( )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Sempra Energy)Tj
0 -6 TD
( )Tj
ET
510.306 199.284 m
564.274 199.284 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 200.464 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 183.865 m
510.306 183.865 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 185.0447 Tm
( Page \
20)Tj
0 -2.4 TD
( Silicon Valley Leadership Group)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( South Coast Air Quality Management District)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( State Association of Electrical Workers)Tj
T*
( State Building and Construction Trades Council)Tj
T*
( State Pipe Trades Council)Tj
T*
( Toyota \(in concept\))Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Transportation and Land Use Coalition)Tj
T*
( Trust for Public Land)Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(23 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
120 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 755.5594 Tm
( Western State Council of Sheet Metal Workers)Tj
ET
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
86.275 738.96 m
93.984 738.96 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 740.1401 Tm
( )Tj
ET
9.178 723.541 m
163.371 723.541 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 724.7207 Tm
( Opposition)Tj
ET
9.178 708.122 m
86.275 708.122 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 709.3014 Tm
( )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Associated General Contractors of CA)Tj
T*
( Automobile Club of Southern CA)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( CA Association of Realtors)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( CA Business Properties Association)Tj
T*
( CA Chamber of Commerce)Tj
T*
( CA Contract Cities Association)Tj
T*
( CA Hotel & Lodging Association)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( CA Manufacturers & Technology Association)Tj
T*
( CA Retailers Association)Tj
T*
( CA Association of Councils of Governments \(unless amended\) )Tj
T*
( Consulting Engineers & Land Surveyors of CA)Tj
T*
( Contra Costa Transportation Authority)Tj
T*
( County of Orange)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Department of Finance)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association)Tj
T*
( Inland Empire Transportation Coalition)Tj
T*
( Kern County Board of Supervisors)Tj
T*
( Merced County Association of Governments)Tj
T*
( Orange County Transportation Authority)Tj
T*
( Orange County Business Council)Tj
T*
( Placer County Transportation Planning Agency)Tj
T*
( Resource Landowners Coalition)Tj
T*
( San Bernardino Local Agency Formation Commission)Tj
T*
( San Diego Association of Governments)Tj
T*
( San Joaquin Valley Regional Policy Council)Tj
T*
( Self-Help Counties Coalition)Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( Sonoma County Transportation Authority)Tj
T*
( Southwest CA Legislative Council)Tj
T*
( Transportation Agency for Monterey County)Tj
T*
( Transportation CA)Tj
T*
( Ventura Council of Governments)Tj
T*
( Western Riverside Council of Governments)Tj
0 -7.2 TD
( )Tj
ET
510.306 60.511 m
564.274 60.511 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 61.6902 Tm
( SB 375\
)Tj
ET
9.178 45.091 m
510.306 45.091 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 46.2708 Tm
( Page \
21)Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(24 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
121 0 obj<>stream
/Artifact <>BDC
0 0 0 rg
0 i
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 Tc 0 Tw 0 Ts 100 Tz 0 Tr 8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 780.7313 Tm
(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)Tj
ET
EMC
/Article <>BDC
q
0 18 612 756 re
W* n
0 0 0 RG
0.393 w 10 M 0 j 0 J []0 d
86.275 738.96 m
255.887 738.96 l
S
BT
/T1_1 1 Tf
12.8494 0 0 12.8494 9.1782 740.1401 Tm
( Analysis Prepared by : J. Stacey Sullivan / L. GOV. / \(9\
16\) )Tj
0 -1.2 TD
( 319-3958 )Tj
ET
EMC
/Artifact <>BDC
Q
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
8.2603 0 0 8.2603 18 7.7313 Tm
(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_200808\
18_153416_asm_comm.html\r \(25 of 26\)3/16/2009 9:28:36 AM)Tj
ET
EMC
endstream
endobj
122 0 obj(SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis)
endobj
123 0 obj<>
endobj
124 0 obj<>
endobj
125 0 obj<>
endobj
126 0 obj<>
endobj
127 0 obj[124 0 R]
endobj
128 0 obj(http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/07-08/bill/sen/sb_0351-0400/sb_375_cfa_20080818_153416_asm_comm.html\r)
endobj
129 0 obj(•ƒINŸïªöV™¼mò)
endobj
130 0 obj<>
endobj
131 0 obj<>
endobj
132 0 obj( À‹7lCêˆèÒšd]í@)
endobj
133 0 obj<>
endobj
134 0 obj<>
endobj
135 0 obj<>
endobj
136 0 obj<>
endobj
137 0 obj<>
endobj
138 0 obj<>stream
2009-03-16T09:28:36-04:00
2009-03-16T09:28:26-04:00
2009-03-16T09:28:36-04:00
application/pdf
SB 375 Senate Bill - Bill Analysis
uuid:47b6366f-8cc3-4b6e-837b-a3df8067d6ba
uuid:7b691f9a-c8c3-46e7-9d2a-574c4f7514e4
Acrobat Web Capture 7.0
endstream
endobj
xref
0 139
0000000004 00000 f
0000000016 00000 n
0000000146 00000 n
0000000226 00000 n
0000000006 00000 f
0000000392 00000 n
0000000036 00001 f
0000000460 00000 n
0000000561 00000 n
0000000605 00000 n
0000000652 00000 n
0000001469 00000 n
0000001663 00000 n
0000001939 00000 n
0000001963 00000 n
0000002157 00000 n
0000002181 00000 n
0000002375 00000 n
0000002399 00000 n
0000002593 00000 n
0000002617 00000 n
0000002812 00000 n
0000002836 00000 n
0000003031 00000 n
0000003055 00000 n
0000003250 00000 n
0000003274 00000 n
0000003469 00000 n
0000003493 00000 n
0000003688 00000 n
0000003712 00000 n
0000003907 00000 n
0000003931 00000 n
0000004127 00000 n
0000004220 00000 n
0000004313 00000 n
0000000039 00001 f
0000004399 00000 n
0000004423 00000 n
0000000042 00001 f
0000004619 00000 n
0000004643 00000 n
0000000045 00001 f
0000004839 00000 n
0000004863 00000 n
0000000048 00001 f
0000005059 00000 n
0000005083 00000 n
0000000052 00001 f
0000005279 00000 n
0000005303 00000 n
0000005499 00000 n
0000000055 00001 f
0000005592 00000 n
0000005616 00000 n
0000000058 00001 f
0000005812 00000 n
0000005836 00000 n
0000000061 00001 f
0000006032 00000 n
0000006056 00000 n
0000000064 00001 f
0000006252 00000 n
0000006276 00000 n
0000000068 00001 f
0000006472 00000 n
0000006496 00000 n
0000006692 00000 n
0000000071 00001 f
0000006785 00000 n
0000006809 00000 n
0000000074 00001 f
0000007005 00000 n
0000007029 00000 n
0000000077 00001 f
0000007225 00000 n
0000007249 00000 n
0000000080 00001 f
0000007445 00000 n
0000007469 00000 n
0000000084 00001 f
0000007665 00000 n
0000007689 00000 n
0000007885 00000 n
0000000086 00001 f
0000007985 00000 n
0000000087 00001 f
0000000088 00001 f
0000000089 00001 f
0000000090 00001 f
0000000091 00001 f
0000000092 00001 f
0000000093 00001 f
0000000094 00001 f
0000000000 00001 f
0000008009 00000 n
0000008099 00000 n
0000012302 00000 n
0000015681 00000 n
0000019166 00000 n
0000022269 00000 n
0000025468 00000 n
0000028913 00000 n
0000032832 00000 n
0000036036 00000 n
0000039669 00000 n
0000043089 00000 n
0000046276 00000 n
0000049895 00000 n
0000053622 00000 n
0000057354 00000 n
0000061438 00000 n
0000065415 00000 n
0000066180 00000 n
0000070129 00000 n
0000073631 00000 n
0000078113 00000 n
0000081975 00000 n
0000085739 00000 n
0000088703 00000 n
0000091653 00000 n
0000094812 00000 n
0000095698 00000 n
0000095751 00000 n
0000095789 00000 n
0000095923 00000 n
0000095954 00000 n
0000096056 00000 n
0000096082 00000 n
0000096198 00000 n
0000096233 00000 n
0000096524 00000 n
0000096577 00000 n
0000096612 00000 n
0000096658 00000 n
0000096702 00000 n
0000096746 00000 n
0000096829 00000 n
0000096945 00000 n
trailer
<]>>
startxref
100431
%%EOF